>>>>> "SB" == Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SB> sense to kill the dual server setup as we endorse now (where mod_perl is SB> the backend) and have only one server, with different pools. Another benefit of the front/back end setup is that the ligthweight front-ends buffer the output from the heavy mod_perl processes, freeing them up quickly to handle more requests. You don't want mod_perl talking directly to slow clients. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Doug MacEachern
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Stas Bekman
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Doug MacEachern
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Stas Bekman
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Doug MacEachern
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Stas Bekman
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Doug MacEachern
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Stas Bekman
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Doug MacEachern
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Stas Bekman
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Vivek Khera
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Stas Bekman
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Doug MacEachern
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Paul Cotter
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Stas Bekman
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Vivek Khera
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Stas Bekman
- Re: dual server setup with 2.0? Vivek Khera
