On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Vivek Khera wrote:
> >>>>> "SB" == Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> SB> sense to kill the dual server setup as we endorse now (where mod_perl is
> SB> the backend) and have only one server, with different pools.
>
> Another benefit of the front/back end setup is that the ligthweight
> front-ends buffer the output from the heavy mod_perl processes,
> freeing them up quickly to handle more requests. You don't want
> mod_perl talking directly to slow clients.
Heh, Vivek :) That's exactly the gist of this thread... That's why we are
talking about buffer sizes :)
with 2.0 you can get the same effeciency as you have had before with a
dual server setup.
_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://apachetoday.com http://logilune.com/
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
