On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 07:54:44AM -0800, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> 
> > in any case C allows you to say 'type   *' why WrapXS shouldn't.
> 
> yeah but we don't do that.  'type *' is the code style, why invent a 
> different style for the .map files?  stick with the enforced style please.
> 

Maybe, but I believe the parsing shouldn't be _that_ strict. Either
accept & deal with it, or warn loudly about it.

I just don't like it when I 'mistakenly' indent something and all of
a sudden my code isn't being generated okay anymore, for example ;-)

Just a thought.

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philippe M. Chiasson /gozer\@(cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/ 88C3A5A5 (122FF51B/C634E37B)
http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/    F9BF E0C2 480E 7680 1AE5 3631 CB32 A107 88C3 A5A5
Q: It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
perl -e'$$=\${gozer};{$_=unpack(P7,pack(L,$$));/^JAm_pH\n$/&&print||$$++&&redo}'

Attachment: msg02453/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to