Since in 2.0 we have the number of handlers almost doubled, do you think that it's a good idea to advise using the triple naming, suggested by Per Einar, as in:
Apache::PostConfig::Whatever instead of: Apache::PostConfigWhatever I'm working on examples for the handlers added in 2.0, and not sure what the convention to use. Doug, I remember you were saying that it's better to use "Apache::" . $HandlerName . $ModuleName rather than: "Apache::" . $HandlerName . "::" . $ModuleName because the stash lookup is faster when there are only two levels of indirection. What do you think? Thanks! __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
