On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: > I understand your position Doug, but people seemed to agree (I say "seemed" > because there weren't that many replies) that we needed a better > organization of the modules, and the extra '::' actually gives a better > separation for the human mind :) You can see > http://mathforum.org/epigone/modperl/skeldkendtrau for the thread. The > problem is that if you oppose that (as well as Stas), there won't be any > change. Do you feel really strongly about this? Because atleast for the > Auth* and Log* there is "some kind" of organization now, but for the others > it's mostly a mess.
i don't feel too strongly. however, if you do feel strongly, i would ask a few things: - take the existing Apache::* modules and create a list (perhaps module list style) using your suggested naming convention and let's see how it looks - ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] why the module list says: "Please avoid using more than one level of nesting for module names (packages or classes within modules can, of course, use any number)." to gain their insight or perhaps to hear they no longer feel that way. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
