Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>I was writing a proper reverse filter for the docs, which doesn't add >>\n's which weren't in the input, handles [\r\n] and properly handles >>long lines which may not fit into the buffer in one chunk. Any >>objections if I use it in the reverse.pm test instead of the one that we >>have? > > > "proper reverse filter" ? there is no such thing. nobody in the real > world is going to reverse the output of data sent to the client (i hope :). > the purpose of the example is simply to show: > > read-data-from-filter > modify-data > send-data-to-client > > your changes defeat this purpose by making the example difficult to see > that.
I agree. > i suggest leaving the reverse filter as-is. and come up with a > "proper" example that does something more useful than simply illustrate > how to use the api. my attempt at this was Apache::FormatText. Do you still have it around? You said that you couldn't find your last year's files. __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
