I'm going to release a first 2.0 module on CPAN. I'm wondering about the
top level namespace naming.
I suggest the following spec:
*** Core 2.0 modules
Apache:: -- Apache API
APR:: -- APR API
ModPerl:: -- ModPerl API
(we have this already in place)
*** 3rd party modules
ModPerl:: -- Working with 1.0 and 2.0
ModPerl2:: -- Working only with 2.0
modules that work with 1.0 should work under 2.0 as-is under prefork mpm.
the '2' in ModPerl2 is very essential to hint CPAN users that this
module is for mod_perl 2.0 only. In the future we might have ModPerl3::,
which will work only with mod_perl 3.0. (who's the 3.0 pumpkin, btw? :)
So if that's cool with you guys, at some point I'm going to release on
CPAN ModPerl2::Filter::Snoop or something like that.
We end up with CPAN having both Apache:: and ModPerl:: namespaces, but
c'est la vie.
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: rfc: top level 2.0 CPAN modules naming Stas Bekman
- Re: rfc: top level 2.0 CPAN modules naming Per Einar Ellefsen
- Re: rfc: top level 2.0 CPAN modules naming Geoffrey Young
- Re: rfc: top level 2.0 CPAN modules naming Stas Bekman
- Re: rfc: top level 2.0 CPAN modules naming Geoffrey Young
- Re: rfc: top level 2.0 CPAN modules na... Stas Bekman
- Re: rfc: top level 2.0 CPAN modules naming Doug MacEachern
- Re: rfc: top level 2.0 CPAN modules naming Stas Bekman
- Re: rfc: top level 2.0 CPAN modules naming Doug MacEachern
- Re: rfc: top level 2.0 CPAN modules na... Stas Bekman
- Re: rfc: top level 2.0 CPAN modul... Doug MacEachern