Doug MacEachern wrote:
Doesn't Apache2 subdir solve the problem? All other modules with the same name in 1.0 and 2.0 still have the same name.On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:no, that was just so we could have the new version and old co-exist in the same place while the new was being developed.Doug MacEachern wrote:The idea came from ModPerl::Registry, I thought that's why it was renamed from Apache::Registry in first place.never intended the ModPerl:: namespace to be for third-party modules. why the change from Apache:: ?
If that's the only reason, I'd rather see it reverted to Apache::, people keep on referring to Apache::Registry when they mean ModPerl::Registry and it's very confusing.
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
