Stas Bekman wrote:
only that the docs are up to snuff. I guess that there could be issues with pod2man if there is something awry. a derivitave of this test is something I now add to all my distributions :)Geoffrey Young wrote:ok, I also have pod.t laying around. I put it in t/pod/pod.t and it seems to be working ok for me.
if you run it in verbose mode on the current sources, you get 103 tests, with a pod error in APR/Table.pod
ok, but what mod_perl functionality are we testing here?
the docs are already tested by the perl.apache.org site's build tool.
ok, I didn't know that.
I guess it could be more strict... we don't want the test suite report < 100% because some pod is imperfect.we do, but end users probably don't :) that's why adding a pod tester is a good idea - it ensures that (if you follow good procedures and always make test before you release) that your pod isn't broken in a release.
--Geoff
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
