On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 14:21, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> > Following the discussion on Apache::Reload and Apache::Symbol, I've
> > taken out Apache::Symbol::undef from mp1, massaged it a bit and made it
> > into ModPerl::Util::undef for mod_perl 2.
> >
> > Works wonders when you want to undefine subroutines, constant or not,
> > with or without prototypes. Very usefull for Apache::Reload (can get rid
> > of that $SIG{__WARN__} trap).
>
> As suggested in the other thread, ModPerl::Util::undef is not the best choice
> for the name. Me thinking either call ModPerl::Util::symbol_undef or have
> further subclassing: ModPerl::Util::Symbol::undefHow about like I said before ModPerl::Util::undef_code since it works only on CODE refs? > Otherwise +1, but again please first ask Doug why hasn't he ported this code > in first place. Will do ;-) > __________________________________________________________________ > Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker > http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com > http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Philippe M. Chiasson /gozer\@(cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/ 88C3A5A5 (122FF51B/C634E37B) http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/ F9BF E0C2 480E 7680 1AE5 3631 CB32 A107 88C3 A5A5 Q: It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious. perl -e'$$=\${gozer};{$_=unpack(P7,pack(L,$$));/^JAm_pH\n$/&&print||$$++&&redo}'
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
