On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
[ .. ]
Do you have the same issue if you run them as:
perl t/TEST testname
instead of using 'nmake'? If that's the case, it's not an issue with SMOKE.
Running the tests that fail under t/SMOKE as perl t/TEST testname reports them passing.
Thanks, Randy. And if you run:
perl t/TEST -start perl t/TEST -run testname perl t/TEST -stop
if this still works, what if you run TestSmoke's test_run alone by ripping it off and just hardcoding things?
I've attached a patch (for Steve's benefit, as it's Win32 specific) which, first of all, uses Win32::Process (to rule out problems coming from IPC::Run3), and which defines two functions: run_command - uses system() to run a command, and returns a flag indicating success; run_command_dup - uses Win32::Process to run a command, capturing the STDOUT and STDERR and then returning the text.
- if one uses run_command_dup to start/stop the server and run the tests, then the error with failing to dup STDOUT results, for those tests that use perl-script. - if one uses run_command_dup to start/stop the server, but uses run_command to run the tests, then the same error results. - if one uses run_command to start/stop the server and run the tests, then all tests pass.
What about the 4th option:
- if one uses run_command to start/stop the server and uses run_command_dup to run the tests, ...
also isn't the third option exactly what we have now with IPC::Run? (i.e. using system everywhere?)
__________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
