At 19:28 21/10/2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Ayhan Ulusoy wrote:

But if turns out to be so, the module can be called Sandwich then. Otherwise, I am inclined towards picking another name.

Just an idea. Use a different name, but include a subclass of that module which can be called Sandwich as a back-compat module which will work as before. But probably it's not worth the effort ;)


Yupp. That's a good one.

+ Maybe dumping the latest Sandwich code to Apache::Sandwich::MP1
and having an Apache::Sandwich that just has a BEGIN { .. @ISA ...} ugliness which branches on mod_perl version, so that the luggage overhead can be kept to a minimum.


Then again, I am not sure it's worth the effort either.




--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to