At 19:28 21/10/2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Ayhan Ulusoy wrote:
But if turns out to be so, the module can be called Sandwich then. Otherwise, I am inclined towards picking another name.
Just an idea. Use a different name, but include a subclass of that module which can be called Sandwich as a back-compat module which will work as before. But probably it's not worth the effort ;)
Yupp. That's a good one.
+ Maybe dumping the latest Sandwich code to Apache::Sandwich::MP1
and having an Apache::Sandwich that just has a BEGIN { .. @ISA ...} ugliness which branches on mod_perl version, so that the luggage overhead can be kept to a minimum.
Then again, I am not sure it's worth the effort either.
I'd suggest to follow the followin principle: if there is only one user asking to port it, do nothing, as this module is trivial to implement by the user herself. If you see that many people are interested then go ahead and port it.
__________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
