Haroon Rafique wrote:
On Today at 12:11pm, GY=>Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GY> GY> ok, that's just a warning. I assume that is the target of an Include
GY> directive in your default httpd.conf?
GY>
That's correct. I found the following line in the apache2.conf file (supplied by Gentoo package management system):
Include conf/modules.d/*.conf
hmm... so wildcards are in by default on gentoo. does anyone else know of other standard distributions that use wildcards? I certainly don't want the warning to raise lots of eyebrows and suspicions...
what we could do is to try to expand it with <> and if at least one file exist copy it over?
As for the release I think keep things as they are (plus your fix of the bug in the previous reply and a small thing I just committed in build/win32_fetch_apxs) and release the baby. Next we can handle the wild-cards for the next separate A-T release.
__________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
