Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> As Joe suggested my idea won't work, since by including all other > object files we will introduce new dependencies on ap_, so we need to > figure out how to handle the Pool.so to get rid of the dependency on > request_rec. Right- it looks pretty tricky to me because of how mp2's ithread pools interacts with the APR::Pool's cleanup callbacks. Because of this, I'm tempted to suggest that the current APR::Pool implementation should be renamed Apache::Pool, and a new (simpler) base class APR::Pool should be constructed that doesn't rely on ap_*. -- Joe Schaefer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
