Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
As Joe suggested my idea won't work, since by including all other
object files we will introduce new dependencies on ap_, so we need to
figure out how to handle the Pool.so to get rid of the dependency on
request_rec.
Right- it looks pretty tricky to me because of how mp2's ithread pools interacts with the APR::Pool's cleanup callbacks. Because of this, I'm tempted to suggest that the current APR::Pool implementation should be renamed Apache::Pool, and a new (simpler) base class APR::Pool should be constructed that doesn't rely on ap_*.
Yes, that's quite possible. I didn't have a chance to look at it though.
__________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
