>>The following patches delays ap_setup_prelinked_modules to slightly >>later, after >>ap_server_config_defines has been proprely initialized. > > > that all seems reasonable. does anyone know of any historical (or other) > reasons why this shouldn't be shuffled a bit?
this has been committed to 2.1 and proposed for backport to 2.0. vote early, vote often. --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
