Geoffrey Young wrote: >>>The following patches delays ap_setup_prelinked_modules to slightly >>>later, after >>>ap_server_config_defines has been proprely initialized. >> >> >>that all seems reasonable. does anyone know of any historical (or other) >>reasons why this shouldn't be shuffled a bit? > > > this has been committed to 2.1 and proposed for backport to 2.0. vote > early, vote often.
now part of 2.0.51-dev, to be released with 2.0.51. thanks all :) --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
