> Is it in the upcoming 2.0.51? In which case we may need to subject tests > to skip on OpenBSD && apache_version < 2.0.51?
The APR CVS tree has been updated. Since there hasn't yet been an Apache 2.0.51 tag applied, I can't say for sure that it's part of 2.0.51. If the standard is to use the HEAD APR library, then it will definitely be in 2.0.51. Do you know what their policy is for building the Apache distribution tar ball? TTUL Ken > >----- Forwarded message from Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- > > > >From: Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:33:14 +0100 > >To: Ken Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD > >User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i > > > >On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:20:30AM -0700, Ken Simpson wrote: > > > >>Hi Joe, > >>This patch definitely works. What do I need to do to ensure that the > >>patch is applied to APR? BTW, I have signed an Apache Foundation > >>contributors' agreement. > > > > > >Thanks for testing it out. The patch has already been applied for the > >next 0.9.x and 1.0.x releases. > > > >joe > > > >----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > -- > __________________________________________________________________ > Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker > http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com > http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com -- MailChannels: Imagine no more spam -- http://www.mailchannels.com MailChannels Corporation Suite 1600, 1188 West Georgia St. Vancouver, BC, Canada Ken Simpson, CEO +1-604-729-1741 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
