On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Geoffrey Young wrote: > some other thoughts I've had > > - Apache2::OK seems odd. > > - ditto with Apache2->server. > > in both these cases Apache.pm is a virtual package with no > corresponding real file, so I'm not sure that we need to > use Apache2. except that it would be consistent with all > the other Apache2 foo. but Apache2::OK seems really, > really strange to me. > > in general, as we moved away from using the Apache:: > namespace at all (like favoring > Apache::ServerUtil::server_root_relative) it has been > unclear on what to do with things like the above. > > so, thoughts at this point? anyone :)
Apache2::OK seems a bit strange to me as well. However, I like the clean separation of the mp2 Apache2::* stuff from the mp1/Apache-Test Apache::* stuff; I think it will make migration easier. -- best regards, randy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
