On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 10:33 -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote: > some other thoughts I've had > > - Apache2::OK seems odd. > > - ditto with Apache2->server. > > in both these cases Apache.pm is a virtual package with no corresponding > real file, so I'm not sure that we need to use Apache2. except that it > would be consistent with all the other Apache2 foo. but Apache2::OK seems > really, really strange to me.
It doesn't seem strange to me. This is Apache2, and OK is a constant it provides. Dumb question: Why isn't it Apache2::Const::OK? - Perrin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
