Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Stas Bekman wrote:
[...] >> Me too :) should we call it 'ithreads'? >> >> svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/perl/modperl/branches/ithreads? > > sounds good. maybe the unstable- prefix like apreq and the rename did > is also a good When making the branches, I used $purpose-$status as the mental template for naming them. $purpose was defined in relation to trunk; $status was an estimate of how much code flux would probably happen before the branch might be ready to merge/replace trunk. In this case I'd suggest using "clone-skip-unstable", because "ithreads" seems too generic to me. IMO if that branch doesn't pan out, then rename it "clone-skip-dead" and start a new one, with a new $purpose, by either copying from trunk or from that dead branch. -- Joe Schaefer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
