Joe Schaefer wrote:
Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stas Bekman wrote:
[...]
Me too :) should we call it 'ithreads'?
svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/perl/modperl/branches/ithreads?
sounds good. maybe the unstable- prefix like apreq and the rename did
is also a good
When making the branches, I used $purpose-$status as the mental
template for naming them. $purpose was defined in relation to trunk;
$status was an estimate of how much code flux would probably happen
before the branch might be ready to merge/replace trunk.
In this case I'd suggest using "clone-skip-unstable", because
"ithreads" seems too generic to me. IMO if that branch doesn't
pan out, then rename it "clone-skip-dead" and start a new one,
with a new $purpose, by either copying from trunk or from that
dead branch.
Works for me. Thanks for the suggestions, folks.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
