On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Hi, > > knock out 1 of the todo/bugs_apr_ext :) > FYI: APR::NetLib does not exist. > > See attached. > > HTH
That'd be nice to clean this up ... I'm wondering though about having, in particular, apr-ext tests for socket.pm sockaddr.pm brigade.pm that simply load the modules. In looking at the corrsponding responses in t/response/TestAPR/, it appears in their current form that all 3 of these require mod_perl to do their work. Might having a corresponding apr-ext test lead some to believe that these function outside of mod_perl, and so in this context their presence could be considered somewhat misleading? Also, I seem to recall that we had a test just for APR::Const, but dropped it, as APR::Const was used in a number of the other tests anyway. The test itself I seem to remember was just comparing some APR::Const::* to a numerical value, which may be difficult to maintain, in case APR at the C level changes the numerical value. -- best regards, randy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
