Joe Schaefer wrote: > Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>What my proposal has to do with Apache versions? I was talking about >>the mp2.x issue. > > > Just to make sure I understand you, are you saying that mp2.2 will > also support apache-2.0? I'm just trying to understand what is the > significance of the minor number here. Are you saying the rule for mp2.x > will be the same as for perl.5.x, with deprecation cycles, etc.? > > >>How people are going to distinguish between mp2.0 and mp2.2 other than >>using $VERSION? If you are introducing extra APIs for versioning at >>least get it right. > > > Ok, lets do that. But first we need to agree on what "right" is.
didn't we have this discussion already? IIRC my initial implementation had major/minor and after discussion we decided against it. --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
