On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 08:49 -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > I also agree with whichever faction says this can't happen in 2.0.x. > > that's (at least) me. I believe philippe was in favor of fixing it...
Me too. I don't think this is a bug, since it behaves normally for a Perl hash. It's been documented now, and I think that should be the end of it. - Perrin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
