On 7-Jun-06, at 1:07 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 08:49 -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
I also agree with whichever faction says this can't happen in 2.0.x.
that's (at least) me. I believe philippe was in favor of fixing
it...
Me too. I don't think this is a bug, since it behaves normally for a
Perl hash. It's been documented now, and I think that should be
the end
of it.
I hope there is more than just me now that think this is worth fixing ?
As much as I can remeber, wenever a user was caught by this bug, it
was , 95% of
the time, because they expected that $r->pnotes behaved like a hash
even though it didn't
quite so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
