-1 due to PHOENIX-1184 which was not including both the hadoop1 and
hadoop2 compiled jars for our phoenix-pig and phoenix-flume modules.
Will start a vote on a new RC shortly.

Thanks,
James

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Jeffrey Zhong <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Phoenix 4.1 can run on hdp2.1 with not using
> ‘org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.ipc.PhoenixIndexRpcSchedulerFactory’ in
> configuration. But we won’t advise people to use it because next HDP
> version we will ship 4.1 with hbase 0.98.4+ and we’ll only test on this
> combination.
>
> PHOENIX-1207 is created for the new Phoenix-server jar.
>
> Thanks,
> -Jeffrey
>
> On 8/23/14, 4:54 PM, "James Taylor" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Thanks, Jeffrey. Did you do any testing against HDP 2.1? So the
>>phoenix-4.1.0-server*.jar are out of date? Or we include jars that
>>aren't necessary? Would you mind filing a JIRA?
>>
>>    James
>>
>>On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jeffrey Zhong <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>> +1.
>>>
>>> I downloaded the 4.1 & hbase0.98.4 tar balls and run the following
>>> sanity tests against my local Pseudo-distributed hbase cluster.
>>>
>>> 1) run ./sqlline.py fine
>>> 2) run ./psql.py localhost ../../examples/WEB_STAT.sql
>>> ../examples/WEB_STAT.csv ../examples/WEB_STAT_QUERIES.sql can create
>>> table, load data from the sample CSV file and query loaded data
>>> 3) run ./performance.py localhost 100
>>>
>>> I found one following issue:
>>>
>>> 1) we ship phoenix-4.1.0-server*.jar which is a super set of old
>>> phoenix-core*.jar. We should update our installation doc to only include
>>> phoenix-4.1.0-server.jar on region server class path.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -Jeffrey
>>>
>>> On 8/22/14, 5:49 PM, "Jesse Yates" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Ok, after talking to James offline we've come to following solution:
>>>> - updating tracing docs to include the properties in the aforementioned
>>>>files
>>>> - next release will include the config files explicitly
>>>>
>>>>+1 on this RC
>>>>
>>>>-------------------
>>>>Jesse Yates
>>>>@jesse_yates
>>>>jyates.github.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Jesse Yates <[email protected]>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ah, then the phoenix-4.1.0-bin tarball doesn't include the tracing
>>>>>configs
>>>>> for hadoop2. I'm actually not entirely clear on how that tarball is
>>>>> actually created... it doesn't seem to be explicity specified in
>>>>> phoenix-assembly or top-level phoenix pom (but I'm probably just
>>>>>blind).
>>>>>
>>>>> -------------------
>>>>> Jesse Yates
>>>>> @jesse_yates
>>>>> jyates.github.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:57 PM, James Taylor <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We build separate hadoop1/hadoop2 jars and include them both in the
>>>>>> distro,
>>>>>> I believe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> James
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, August 22, 2014, Jesse Yates <[email protected]>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Maybe -1...
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > We don't have a binary artifact for hadoop2, which is necessary to
>>>>>>use
>>>>>> > tracing. I think this was an oversight in the tracing work to not
>>>>>> > differentiate the two tarballs (which are actually different beyond
>>>>>>just
>>>>>> > the jars as hadoop2 includes custom config files as well) since
>>>>>>this
>>>>>>is
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> > first release we actually have anything in the
>>>>>>hadoop2/hadoop-compat
>>>>>> > modules.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > -------------------
>>>>>> > Jesse Yates
>>>>>> > @jesse_yates
>>>>>> > jyates.github.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Eli Levine <[email protected]
>>>>>> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > +1 Looks good to me
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Mujtaba Chohan
>>>>>><[email protected]
>>>>>> > <javascript:;>>
>>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > > +1
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > > > Verified performance is on par with 4.0.0-incubating release.
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > > > //mujtaba
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:14 PM, James Taylor <
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> > <javascript:;>>
>>>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > > > > Hi everyone,
>>>>>> > > > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.1.0 RC0. This
>>>>>>is
>>>>>>the
>>>>>> > > > > next minor release of Phoenix compatible with the 0.98 branch
>>>>>>of
>>>>>> > > > > Apache HBase and will be our second release as a top level
>>>>>> project.
>>>>>> > The
>>>>>> > > > > release includes both a source-only release and a convenience
>>>>>> binary
>>>>>> > > > > release.
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > In addition to having all the bug fixes and the new features
>>>>>> outlined
>>>>>> > > > > for our 3.1 release currently being voted on (
>>>>>> http://s.apache.org/0N
>>>>>> > ),
>>>>>> > > > > it has several additional features:
>>>>>> > > > > - Support for local indexing which targets write heavy, space
>>>>>> > > > > constrained use cases by colocating index and table data on
>>>>>>the
>>>>>> same
>>>>>> > > > > region server (
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>>http://phoenix.apache.org/secondary_indexing.html#Local_Indexing
>>>>>> ).
>>>>>> > > > > - Support for tracing which leverages Cloudera¹s HTrace
>>>>>>library to
>>>>>> > > > > show per-request performance metrics all they way from the
>>>>>>client
>>>>>> > > > > through into the HBase server, and back again
>>>>>> > > > > (http://phoenix.apache.org/tracing.html).
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > For a complete list of changes, see:
>>>>>> > > > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/phoenix/4.0/CHANGES
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be
>>>>>> found
>>>>>> > at:
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/phoenix-4.1.0-rc0/src/
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > The binary artifacts can be found at:
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/phoenix-4.1.0-rc0/bin/
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>> > > > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/mujtaba.asc
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > KEYS file available here:
>>>>>> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/phoenix/KEYS
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > The hash and tag to be voted upon:
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=phoenix.git;a=commit;h=98b02
>>>>>>97
>>>>>>5f015159e9589094ff808bd26f8271bfd
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=phoenix.git;a=tag;h=refs/tag
>>>>>>s/
>>>>>>v4.1.0-rc0
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please vote:
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > > > Thanks,
>>>>>> > > > > The Apache Phoenix Team
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
>>>entity to
>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
>>>reader
>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>>>that
>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>>>immediately
>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
>
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.

Reply via email to