Likewise. +1 for option A. Justin
Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 10, 2014, at 8:59 PM, Christopher Tarnas <[email protected]> > wrote: > > We would choose option A. > > Thanks! > -chris > >> On Dec 10, 2014, at 7:49 PM, James Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello Phoenix users, >> We'd like to get an idea of how many users are still relying on the >> Phoenix 3.x releases that work with HBase 0.94. We've been diligently >> maintaining feature parity (as much as possible) between the 3.x >> releases and 4.x releases, but the cost of continuing to do so is >> becoming an ever increasing overhead. As such, we're considering >> winding down the 3.x releases, but wanted to get your feedback first. >> >> If you had to choose one of the following, please let us know which one: >> a) I don't use the 3.x releases. Please focus on fixes and >> enhancements to the 4.x releases instead. >> b) I use a 3.x release, but I don't plan on upgrading so it's no >> problem if releases start winding down. >> c) I use the 3.x release and need at least crucial bug fixes >> backported from 4.x, but features parity is not important. >> d) I use 3.x release and need feature parity with the 4.x release. >> e) Quit sending me so much email :-) >> >> Thanks, >> James (on behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC)
