-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A. We are currently updating to 4.x.
Vaclav On 12/11/2014 08:56 AM, Anil Gupta wrote: > Option A. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Dec 10, 2014, at 7:57 PM, Christopher Tarnas >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We would choose option A. >> >> Thanks! -chris >> >>> On Dec 10, 2014, at 7:49 PM, James Taylor >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Phoenix users, We'd like to get an idea of how many users >>> are still relying on the Phoenix 3.x releases that work with >>> HBase 0.94. We've been diligently maintaining feature parity >>> (as much as possible) between the 3.x releases and 4.x >>> releases, but the cost of continuing to do so is becoming an >>> ever increasing overhead. As such, we're considering winding >>> down the 3.x releases, but wanted to get your feedback first. >>> >>> If you had to choose one of the following, please let us know >>> which one: a) I don't use the 3.x releases. Please focus on >>> fixes and enhancements to the 4.x releases instead. b) I use a >>> 3.x release, but I don't plan on upgrading so it's no problem >>> if releases start winding down. c) I use the 3.x release and >>> need at least crucial bug fixes backported from 4.x, but >>> features parity is not important. d) I use 3.x release and need >>> feature parity with the 4.x release. e) Quit sending me so much >>> email :-) >>> >>> Thanks, James (on behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUiWCDAAoJEG3mD8Wtuk0WkA8IAJrMBCDNa3DkUjobPpLy4gsN D3sHj7OhmeNVzwsCnhqRHVk3SeoG5PIEcgPLfzPGChKEIQo2zM5NHqbrQX9Dryt4 dIXa7RaINNAaM59i6dMceTKKvLayoClgZa4FGyycvvaFNKMKi5UulomD47P7gqOg YBe2D86+AahJJKbhyU0sEqXdd5cOTw5BTYf3Pca8OUHnmDzl3Zj1yppL5J0UPWaw flw1N7rSuhxV6WoOQJIOly/VGi4KXqysZCbvD2+UNUXeRwS47rr+dgC4R8E/JNUh 29+BTBGpsi6xS5rqCAUXjbm68drvwXaAZk4dJSJB4dsnBhgRbRKnwfsAyjV0itc= =6YDS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
