Got it. So in the mean time I will try to keep my eyes on the questions as they come in and I'll figure out a way to capture the answers. I'm pretty focused on the Tuning Guide for now, but maybe I'll start looking at other ways to improve the docs (unless I get swamped by other priorities).
Have you had a chance to look at the Tuning Guide? Thanks, Peter Peter Conrad Staff Technical Writer: Infrastructure | salesforce.com Office: (415) 471-5265 [image: http://www.salesforce.com/signature] <http://www.salesforce.com/signature> -- On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:13 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks, Peter. The main means of interaction at Apache are email and JIRAs. > These can then lead to commits (including website updates). I think it's > less about the medium of communication and more about the defining the > right processes, coordination, workflow, and automation that would need to > be put in place; It'd be like figuring out how to setup and run a test lab: > determining the right structure (does Pherf provide enough and if not, > where are the gaps and what are the alternatives), getting representative > use cases with queries and validating that they work, setting up and > monitoring the jobs that run them; having some self service mechanism to > tweak them, etc. Often the queries and data sizes would be considered > proprietary so users would not be able to provide them. > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Peter Conrad <pcon...@salesforce.com> > wrote: > > > James: > > > > Is there a formalized way that people from the community can get me > > information that I can then collate, restructure, and rewrite into docs? > I > > am on the email lists, and I'm doing what I can to collect information > from > > there, but a more focused effort might also be productive. > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > Peter Conrad > > > > Staff Technical Writer: Infrastructure | salesforce.com > > > > Office: (415) 471-5265 > > > > > > [image: http://www.salesforce.com/signature] > > <http://www.salesforce.com/signature> > > > > -- > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:00 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Would be cool if there was a page on how to do tpc-h along with what > > > works > > > > and what does not from the suite, even if it was just for the latest > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > Yes, agreed. That'd be a good first contribution - a one pager on how > to > > > configure and run tpc-h. > > > > > > In general, it'd be great if in our user community we could begin to > > > collect these kind of use case simulations. The entire community could > > > learn a lot from each other. One potential way this could be structured > > > would be as Pherf[1] scenarios where the config parameters and tuning > is > > > captured. I'm not sure how the TCP benchmarks map to the real world use > > > cases of our user community. FWIW, there are some outlined here[2] from > > > Sony and eHarmony (linked in the comments section). > > > > > > [1] http://phoenix.apache.org/pherf.html > > > [2] > > > http://www.meetup.com/SF-Bay-Area-Apache-Phoenix-Meetup/ > > events/230545182/ > > > > > >
