On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:19 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>
wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:54 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The data loaded fine for us.
> >
> >
> > Mind describing what you did to get it to work and with what versions and
> > configurations and with what TPC loading and how much of the workload was
> > supported? Was it a one-off project?
> >
>
> Mujtaba already kindly responded to this (about a week back on this
> thread). He was able to load the data for the benchmark onto one of our
> internal clusters. He didn't run the benchmarks. Sorry, but I don't have
> any more specific knowledge....



Thanks. I was just wondering if more than a select count was done and if
more detail on the setup was available.



> > > If TPC is not representative of real
> > > workloads, I'm not sure there's value in spending a lot of time running
> > > them.
> >
> >
> > I suppose the project could just ignore TPC but I'd suggest that Phoenix
> > put up a page explaining why TPC does not apply if this the case; i.e. it
> > is not representative of Phoenix work loads. When people see that Phoenix
> > is for "OLTP and analytical queries", they probably think the TPC
> loadings
> > will just work given their standing in the industry. Putting up a
> disavowal
> > with explanation will save folks time trying to make it work and it can
> > also be cited when folks try to run TPC against Phoenix and they have a
> bad
> > experience, say bad performance.
> >
>
> I haven't run the TPC benchmarks, so I have no idea how they perform. I
> work at Salesforce where we use Phoenix (among may other technologies) to
> support various big data use cases. The workloads I'm familiar with aren't
> similar to the TPC benchmarks, so they're not relevant for my work. But if
> TPC benchmarks are relevant for your work, then that'd be great if you
> pursued this. Or maybe we can get this "Phoenix" person you mentioned to do
> it (smile).
>
>
I wasn't suggesting you do it James. Relax. I was just trying to gauge
where Phoenix is regards TPC.

I have a long interest in 'canned' loadings. Interesting ones are hard to
come by. If Phoenix ran any or a subset of TPCs, I'd like to try it. I
would like to study how the storage does under the loading to see if we can
make the storage run better. But I don't want to be the first to try it. I
am not a Phoenix expert. II would prefer to learn from one one what works
and what as yet is unsupported.

Thanks,
St.Ack

Reply via email to