Changes in PHOENIX-3432 were committed as part of PHOENIX-3436. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 3:29 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Need to wait PHOENIX-3432 in both branches. > > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 3:27 PM > Subject: Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0 > > I'll clean up Jira for 4.8.2 and spin the RCs. Today and/or early tomorrow. > > From: James Taylor <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 3:00 PM > Subject: Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0 > > I'm in support of 4.8.2. I was just pointing out that we've already started > the release process for 4.9 as your prior email seemed to indicate that > perhaps you weren't aware of that. > > On Wednesday, November 2, 2016, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > There was an earlier discussion here regarding supporting multiple code > > lines. There seemed to be support for that. That implies maintenance of > at > > least one code line prior to the most recent, no? Or otherwise nothing > has > > changed, leaving all users who can't use or don't want the bleeding edge > to > > patch for themselves. > > > > And, especially because 4.8.x won't work with 1.2 at all, I think a > release > > that fixes that problem before moving on from 4.8 is a responsible thing > to > > do. > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM, James Taylor <[email protected] > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > Sounds good, except we've already moved on to 4.9 as we're voting on it > > > now. Second RC will be up today. > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 2, 2016, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] > > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Yes please I think we need a 4.8.x that fixes PHOENIX-3407 on 1.2+ > > before > > > > moving on to 4.9 and up. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, <[email protected] <javascript:;> > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Was going to do it this week. Then again, since 4.9.0 does not > > include > > > > the > > > > > column encoding I was less enthused about it.If we think we want a > > > 4.8.2 > > > > > I'll spin an RC today. > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > > > From: Andrew Purtell <[email protected] <javascript:;> > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > To: "[email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>" < > > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > Cc: lars hofhansl <[email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 11:41 AM > > > > > Subject: Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0 > > > > > > > > > > Right, I think we should address PHOENIX-3407 in current 4.8.x > > releases > > > > > with a fixed version of it. I don't think we can ever fully > > understand > > > > the > > > > > version usage patterns of our users. I've seen folks write in to > > HBase > > > > > lists using 4 year old releases for unfathomable reasons. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:38 AM, James Taylor < > > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Andrew. One question: are there users on 4.8.0 or 4.8.1 > who > > > > would > > > > > > not want to upgrade to 4.9.0? We're in the voting stage for a > 4.9.0 > > > > which > > > > > > has all the fixes in 4.8 branch (and more) and is compatible (as > > > usual) > > > > > > with 4.8 releases through rolling restarts. At SFDC, we'll move > to > > > > 4.9.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > One thing is clear, though. Given PHOENIX-3407 (and HBASE-14465), > > > users > > > > > on > > > > > > HBase 1.2 should not use 4.8.0 or 4.8.1. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Purtell < > > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Need help with making a 4.8.2? I could try my hand at making a > > > > Phoenix > > > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 7:06 PM, James Taylor < > > > > [email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Current plan is to have a 4.9.0 RC in that same timeframe (by > > > > 10/31) > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > the column encoding work (PHOENIX-1598 and PHOENIX-2565) and > > > > > PHOENIX-6 > > > > > > > > (atomic insert/update). If it's too much much for you to do > > both > > > > > 4.8.2 > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > 4.9 simultaneously, I can volunteer to be the RM for 4.9. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 6:42 PM, <[email protected] > > <javascript:;> > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > we have 20 jiras against 4.8.2 some of which seem important > > > > enough > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > over 200 against 4.9.0. > > > > > > > > > I think we should start keeping stable branches for > longer.As > > > > > before > > > > > > > I'll > > > > > > > > > volunteer doing 4.8.2 as well as a 4.9.0. > > > > > > > > > Let's think about a 4.8.2 in two weeks or so, unless > there're > > > > > vastly > > > > > > > > > different opinions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - > > Piet > > > > > Hein > > > > > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > > Hein > > > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > Hein > > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > >
