Sounds good, except we've already moved on to 4.9 as we're voting on it now. Second RC will be up today.
On Wednesday, November 2, 2016, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes please I think we need a 4.8.x that fixes PHOENIX-3407 on 1.2+ before > moving on to 4.9 and up. > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Was going to do it this week. Then again, since 4.9.0 does not include > the > > column encoding I was less enthused about it.If we think we want a 4.8.2 > > I'll spin an RC today. > > -- Lars > > > > From: Andrew Purtell <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > > To: "[email protected] <javascript:;>" <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > > Cc: lars hofhansl <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 11:41 AM > > Subject: Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0 > > > > Right, I think we should address PHOENIX-3407 in current 4.8.x releases > > with a fixed version of it. I don't think we can ever fully understand > the > > version usage patterns of our users. I've seen folks write in to HBase > > lists using 4 year old releases for unfathomable reasons. > > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:38 AM, James Taylor <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks, Andrew. One question: are there users on 4.8.0 or 4.8.1 who > would > > > not want to upgrade to 4.9.0? We're in the voting stage for a 4.9.0 > which > > > has all the fixes in 4.8 branch (and more) and is compatible (as usual) > > > with 4.8 releases through rolling restarts. At SFDC, we'll move to > 4.9.0. > > > > > > One thing is clear, though. Given PHOENIX-3407 (and HBASE-14465), users > > on > > > HBase 1.2 should not use 4.8.0 or 4.8.1. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > James > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Need help with making a 4.8.2? I could try my hand at making a > Phoenix > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 7:06 PM, James Taylor < > [email protected] <javascript:;>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Current plan is to have a 4.9.0 RC in that same timeframe (by > 10/31) > > > with > > > > > the column encoding work (PHOENIX-1598 and PHOENIX-2565) and > > PHOENIX-6 > > > > > (atomic insert/update). If it's too much much for you to do both > > 4.8.2 > > > > and > > > > > 4.9 simultaneously, I can volunteer to be the RM for 4.9. > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 6:42 PM, <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > we have 20 jiras against 4.8.2 some of which seem important > enough > > > ... > > > > > and > > > > > > over 200 against 4.9.0. > > > > > > I think we should start keeping stable branches for longer.As > > before > > > > I'll > > > > > > volunteer doing 4.8.2 as well as a 4.9.0. > > > > > > Let's think about a 4.8.2 in two weeks or so, unless there're > > vastly > > > > > > different opinions. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > Hein > > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
