[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15731336#comment-15731336
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2890:
-----------------------------------------

Github user ankitsinghal commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/210#discussion_r91454867
  
    --- Diff: 
phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/end2end/index/MutableIndexFailureIT.java
 ---
    @@ -385,6 +383,8 @@ private void updateTable(Connection conn, String 
tableName) throws SQLException
         }
     
         public static class FailingRegionObserver extends SimpleRegionObserver 
{
    +        public static volatile boolean FAIL_WRITE = false;
    --- End diff --
    
    This was taken care in the last commit.


> Extend IndexTool to allow incremental index rebuilds
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-2890
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2890
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ankit Singhal
>            Assignee: Ankit Singhal
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.10.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-2890.patch, PHOENIX-2890_wip.patch
>
>
> Currently , IndexTool is used for initial index rebuild but I think we should 
> extend it to be used for recovering index from last disabled timestamp too. 
> In general terms if we run IndexTool on already existing/new index, then it 
> should follow the same semantics as followed by background Index rebuilding 
> thread.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to