[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16495696#comment-16495696
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3534:
-----------------------------------------

Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/303#discussion_r191926624
  
    --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/end2end/ViewIT.java 
---
    @@ -388,51 +435,65 @@ public void 
testViewAndTableInDifferentSchemas(boolean isNamespaceMapped) throws
             } catch (TableNotFoundException ignore) {
             }
             ddl = "DROP TABLE " + fullTableName1;
    -        validateCannotDropTableWithChildViewsWithoutCascade(conn, 
fullTableName1);
             ddl = "DROP VIEW " + fullViewName2;
             conn.createStatement().execute(ddl);
             ddl = "DROP TABLE " + fullTableName1;
             conn.createStatement().execute(ddl);
         }
     
    -    
    +
         @Test
    -    public void testDisallowDropOfColumnOnParentTable() throws Exception {
    +    public void testDropOfColumnOnParentTableInvalidatesView() throws 
Exception {
             Connection conn = DriverManager.getConnection(getUrl());
    +        String fullTableName = generateUniqueTableName();
    +        String viewName = generateUniqueViewName();
    +        splitSystemCatalog(Lists.newArrayList(fullTableName, viewName));
    +
             String ddl = "CREATE TABLE " + fullTableName + " (k1 INTEGER NOT 
NULL, k2 INTEGER NOT NULL, v1 DECIMAL, CONSTRAINT pk PRIMARY KEY (k1, k2))" + 
tableDDLOptions;
             conn.createStatement().execute(ddl);
    -        String viewName = "V_" + generateUniqueName();
             ddl = "CREATE VIEW " + viewName + "(v2 VARCHAR, v3 VARCHAR) AS 
SELECT * FROM " + fullTableName + " WHERE v1 = 1.0";
             conn.createStatement().execute(ddl);
             
    -        try {
    -            conn.createStatement().execute("ALTER TABLE " + fullTableName 
+ " DROP COLUMN v1");
    -            fail();
    -        } catch (SQLException e) {
    -            
assertEquals(SQLExceptionCode.CANNOT_MUTATE_TABLE.getErrorCode(), 
e.getErrorCode());
    +        conn.createStatement().execute("ALTER TABLE " + fullTableName + " 
DROP COLUMN v1");
    +        // TODO see if its possibel to prevent the dropping of a column 
thats required by a child view (for its view where clause)
    +        // the view should be invalid
    --- End diff --
    
    I think it's fine to consider the view invalid (i.e. fail any query that 
attempts to use it) if all it's columns can no longer be found. This is pretty 
typical in RDBMS.


> Support multi region SYSTEM.CATALOG table
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-3534
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3534
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>            Assignee: Thomas D'Silva
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-3534-wip.patch
>
>
> Currently Phoenix requires that the SYSTEM.CATALOG table is single region 
> based on the server-side row locks being held for operations that impact a 
> table and all of it's views. For example, adding/removing a column from a 
> base table pushes this change to all views.
> As an alternative to making the SYSTEM.CATALOG transactional (PHOENIX-2431), 
> when a new table is created we can do a lazy cleanup  of any rows that may be 
> left over from a failed DDL call (kudos to [~lhofhansl] for coming up with 
> this idea). To implement this efficiently, we'd need to also do PHOENIX-2051 
> so that we can efficiently find derived views.
> The implementation would rely on an optimistic concurrency model based on 
> checking our sequence numbers for each table/view before/after updating. Each 
> table/view row would be individually locked for their change (metadata for a 
> view or table cannot span regions due to our split policy), with the sequence 
> number being incremented under lock and then returned to the client.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to