[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16497676#comment-16497676
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3534:
-----------------------------------------

Github user twdsilva commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/303#discussion_r192317466
  
    --- Diff: 
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/coprocessor/MetaDataEndpointImpl.java
 ---
    @@ -1457,28 +1761,69 @@ private static void getSchemaTableNames(Mutation 
row, byte[][] schemaTableNames)
                 schemaTableNames[2] = tName;
             }
         }
    -    
    +
         @Override
         public void createTable(RpcController controller, CreateTableRequest 
request,
                 RpcCallback<MetaDataResponse> done) {
             MetaDataResponse.Builder builder = MetaDataResponse.newBuilder();
             byte[][] rowKeyMetaData = new byte[3][];
             byte[] schemaName = null;
             byte[] tableName = null;
    +        String fullTableName = SchemaUtil.getTableName(schemaName, 
tableName);
             try {
                 int clientVersion = request.getClientVersion();
                 List<Mutation> tableMetadata = 
ProtobufUtil.getMutations(request);
                 MetaDataUtil.getTenantIdAndSchemaAndTableName(tableMetadata, 
rowKeyMetaData);
                 byte[] tenantIdBytes = 
rowKeyMetaData[PhoenixDatabaseMetaData.TENANT_ID_INDEX];
                 schemaName = 
rowKeyMetaData[PhoenixDatabaseMetaData.SCHEMA_NAME_INDEX];
                 tableName = 
rowKeyMetaData[PhoenixDatabaseMetaData.TABLE_NAME_INDEX];
    +            // TODO before creating a table we need to see if the table 
was previously created and then dropped
    +            // and clean up any parent->child links or child views
                 boolean isNamespaceMapped = 
MetaDataUtil.isNameSpaceMapped(tableMetadata, GenericKeyValueBuilder.INSTANCE,
                         new ImmutableBytesWritable());
                 final IndexType indexType = 
MetaDataUtil.getIndexType(tableMetadata, GenericKeyValueBuilder.INSTANCE,
                         new ImmutableBytesWritable());
    +            byte[] parentTenantId = null;
                 byte[] parentSchemaName = null;
                 byte[] parentTableName = null;
                 PTableType tableType = 
MetaDataUtil.getTableType(tableMetadata, GenericKeyValueBuilder.INSTANCE, new 
ImmutableBytesWritable());
    +            ViewType viewType = MetaDataUtil.getViewType(tableMetadata, 
GenericKeyValueBuilder.INSTANCE, new ImmutableBytesWritable());
    +
    +            // Here we are passed the parent's columns to add to a view, 
PHOENIX-3534 allows for a splittable
    +            // System.Catalog thus we only store the columns that are new 
to the view, not the parents columns,
    +            // thus here we remove everything that is ORDINAL.POSITION <= 
baseColumnCount and update the
    +            // ORDINAL.POSITIONS to be shifted accordingly.
    --- End diff --
    
    I filed PHOENIX-4767 to remove the dedup code. We can stop sending the 
parent column metadata in the same release. 


> Support multi region SYSTEM.CATALOG table
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-3534
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3534
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>            Assignee: Thomas D'Silva
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-3534-wip.patch
>
>
> Currently Phoenix requires that the SYSTEM.CATALOG table is single region 
> based on the server-side row locks being held for operations that impact a 
> table and all of it's views. For example, adding/removing a column from a 
> base table pushes this change to all views.
> As an alternative to making the SYSTEM.CATALOG transactional (PHOENIX-2431), 
> when a new table is created we can do a lazy cleanup  of any rows that may be 
> left over from a failed DDL call (kudos to [~lhofhansl] for coming up with 
> this idea). To implement this efficiently, we'd need to also do PHOENIX-2051 
> so that we can efficiently find derived views.
> The implementation would rely on an optimistic concurrency model based on 
> checking our sequence numbers for each table/view before/after updating. Each 
> table/view row would be individually locked for their change (metadata for a 
> view or table cannot span regions due to our split policy), with the sequence 
> number being incremented under lock and then returned to the client.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to