[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16497689#comment-16497689 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3534: ----------------------------------------- Github user twdsilva commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/303#discussion_r192318659 --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/schema/PColumnImpl.java --- @@ -156,14 +209,14 @@ public String toString() { return (familyName == null ? "" : familyName.toString() + QueryConstants.NAME_SEPARATOR) + name.toString(); } - @Override - public int hashCode() { - final int prime = 31; - int result = 1; - result = prime * result + ((familyName == null) ? 0 : familyName.hashCode()); - result = prime * result + ((name == null) ? 0 : name.hashCode()); - return result; - } + @Override + public int hashCode() { + final int prime = 31; + int result = 1; + result = prime * result + ((familyName == null) ? 0 : familyName.hashCode()); + result = prime * result + ((name == null) ? 0 : name.hashCode()); + return result; + } --- End diff -- Fixed > Support multi region SYSTEM.CATALOG table > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: PHOENIX-3534 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3534 > Project: Phoenix > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: James Taylor > Assignee: Thomas D'Silva > Priority: Major > Attachments: PHOENIX-3534-wip.patch > > > Currently Phoenix requires that the SYSTEM.CATALOG table is single region > based on the server-side row locks being held for operations that impact a > table and all of it's views. For example, adding/removing a column from a > base table pushes this change to all views. > As an alternative to making the SYSTEM.CATALOG transactional (PHOENIX-2431), > when a new table is created we can do a lazy cleanup of any rows that may be > left over from a failed DDL call (kudos to [~lhofhansl] for coming up with > this idea). To implement this efficiently, we'd need to also do PHOENIX-2051 > so that we can efficiently find derived views. > The implementation would rely on an optimistic concurrency model based on > checking our sequence numbers for each table/view before/after updating. Each > table/view row would be individually locked for their change (metadata for a > view or table cannot span regions due to our split policy), with the sequence > number being incremented under lock and then returned to the client. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)