I have found another problem, Omid doesn't work with JDK 17.
Not necessarily a blocker, but if we do another RC, it would be nice to
include it.

I'm also working on adding HBase 3 support, which requires a small API
change (that also affects Phoenix)
Again, not a blocker, but we'll have to do another release for 5.2 sooner
than later for HBase 3 support.


On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 9:11 AM Cong Luo <l...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Istvan,
> Using ipv6 on linux operating systems is available, so the reason may be
> limited to users using Mac OS. And then, I using the ping the ipv6 address
> on Mac OS, got the 'Unknown host', obviously macos uses ipv6 as the host
> name. based on this default behavior of the operating system, I recommend
> using macos with ipv4 and others with ipv4/ipv6.
>
> On 2024/01/18 06:54:14 Istvan Toth wrote:
> > I think we should look into this a bit deeper.
> > Why does this fail with IPv6 ?
> >
> > Are we explicitly binding TSO to the IPv4 address only ?
> > Do we only do that in the tests, or does that happen in production ?
> > Is it even possible to use Omid with IPv6 ?
> >
> > I suspect that fixing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-249
> would
> > improve on this.
> >
> > Generally, I think that having a single IP per TSO can be a problem in a
> > mixed IPv4 / IPv6 network, and with some network configurations.
> > Maybe we should store the name of the active server instead of addresses
> in
> > ZK, and kick this problem down to the network/DNS administrator.
> >
> > If Omid is known to not work with IPV6 in 1.1.0 , then I'm OK with Cong's
> > proposed solution, but if it breaks pre-existing Ipv6 support, then we
> > should
> > fix this properly for 1.1.1.
> >
> > We should create a follow-up ticket to make sure the Omid is IPv6 clean
> for
> > the next release at the very least.
> >
> > Istvan
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 6:56 AM Cong Luo <l...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Richard,
> > >   Actually, I had the same issue before, but it was resolved locally:
> if
> > > the NIC was assigned both ipv4 and ipv6 addresses, use ipv4 first. If
> we
> > > all think this is acceptable, then I will create a PR submission.
> > >
> > > On 2024/01/17 14:30:50 Richárd Antal wrote:
> > > > -1
> > > >
> > > > Signature: OK
> > > > Checksum: OK
> > > > mvn clean apache-rat:check: OK
> > > >
> > > > Changes and release notes: OK
> > > >
> > > > Built from source (1.8.0_241): OK
> > > >   - mvn clean install  -DskipTests
> > > > Ran tests on my MacBook locally:
> > > >   - mvn clean verify : Failed
> > > > TestTSOClientConnectionToTSO had failing tests:
> > > > testSuccessfulConnectionToTSOThroughZK and
> > > > testSuccessOfTSOClientReconnectionsToARestartedTSOWithZKPublishing
> > > > It might be because it uses IPv6
> > > > Some logs
> > > >
> > > > 2024-01-17T15:17:45,858 INFO
> > > > >  [TestNGInvoker-testSuccessfulConnectionToTSOThroughZK()]
> > > client.TSOClient:
> > > > > * Current TSO host:port found in ZK:
> > > > > [fe80:0:0:0:aede:48ff:fe00:1122%en5]:52934 Epoch 0
> > > > > 2024-01-17T15:17:45,859 INFO  [tsofsm-0] client.TSOClient: Trying
> to
> > > > > connect to TSO [/fe80:0:0:0:aede:48ff:fe00:1122%en5:52934]
> > > > > 2024-01-17T15:17:45,863 ERROR [tsoclient-worker-0]
> client.TSOClient:
> > > > > Failed connection attempt to TSO
> > > > > [/fe80:0:0:0:aede:48ff:fe00:1122%en5:52934] failed. Channel [id:
> > > 0x9d8c0b44]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I’ve also tested the TestTSOClientConnectionToTSO on the 1.1.0
> release
> > > > locally and that was successful (It used IPv4).
> > > > I think this is a regression on Mac and it would be nice to fix
> before
> > > the
> > > > release.
> > > >
> > > > Richard
> > > >
> > > > Cong Luo <l...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2024. jan. 11., Cs,
> 3:52):
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > I did a basic test last month in the test environment (fully
> > > distributed)
> > > > > based on phoenix 5.1.3 + omid 1.1.1 and did not find a blocking
> issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2024/01/09 12:53:28 "rajeshb...@apache.org" wrote:
> > > > > > Please vote on this Apache phoenix omid release candidate,
> > > > > > phoenix-omid-1.1.1RC0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache phoenix omid 1.1.1
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The tag to be voted on is 1.1.1RC0:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   https://github.com/apache/phoenix-omid/tree/1.1.1RC0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, as well as
> > > CHANGES.md
> > > > > > and RELEASENOTES.md included in this RC can be found at:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/phoenix-omid-1.1.1RC0/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maven artifacts are available in a staging repository at:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachephoenix-1251/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Artifacts were signed with the 0x2CC0FD99 key which can be found
> in:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/phoenix/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To learn more about Apache phoenix omid, please see
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   https://phoenix.apache.org/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Rajeshbabu.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
> > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com
> > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
> > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
> > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
> > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image:
> Cloudera
> > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
> > ------------------------------
> > ------------------------------
> >
>


-- 
*István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
*Email*: st...@cloudera.com
cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
[image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
[image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: Cloudera
on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
------------------------------
------------------------------

Reply via email to