Every problem found in  RC0 should be fixed now.
(Plus I have also merged OMID-275)

Istvan

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:34 AM Istvan Toth <st...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> It would also be nice if OMID-275
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-275> could make it into 1.1.1.
>
> It's a small change, but it would open the possibility of building
> 5.1.4 with future Omid releases which will have to remove
> TTable.getHgetTableDescriptor() for HBase 3 compatibility.
>
> best regards
> Istvan
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 2:58 PM Istvan Toth <st...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> We have worked on this with Richard.
>>
>> I have made some changes to force the test to use IPv6 on my Linux
>> machine, and it still works fine.
>> It is some funky mac networking issue:
>>
>> https://medium.com/@quelgar/java-sockets-broken-for-ipv6-on-mac-5aae72f06b21
>>
>> Please review https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-249, which
>> fixes the issue (at least on Richard's particular mac)
>>
>> best regards
>> Istvan
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 8:07 AM Istvan Toth <st...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Someone who has access to a Mac please try to track down which change
>>> broke the tests.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 8:05 AM Istvan Toth <st...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> PR for JDK17 support is up:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-272
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 6:39 PM rajeshb...@apache.org <
>>>> chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The vote has been canceled to address issues with JDK and Ipv6
>>>>> interface in
>>>>> MacOS
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Rajeshbabu.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:05 PM rajeshb...@apache.org <
>>>>> chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Sure, let me cancel the RC and create another RC after fixes with the
>>>>> > network interface and JDK 17.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks, Richard and Istvan for finding issues, and Cong Luo for your
>>>>> > support.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 9:52 PM Istvan Toth
>>>>> <st...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> I have found another problem, Omid doesn't work with JDK 17.
>>>>> >> Not necessarily a blocker, but if we do another RC, it would be
>>>>> nice to
>>>>> >> include it.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> I'm also working on adding HBase 3 support, which requires a small
>>>>> API
>>>>> >> change (that also affects Phoenix)
>>>>> >> Again, not a blocker, but we'll have to do another release for 5.2
>>>>> sooner
>>>>> >> than later for HBase 3 support.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 9:11 AM Cong Luo <l...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > Hi Istvan,
>>>>> >> > Using ipv6 on linux operating systems is available, so the reason
>>>>> may be
>>>>> >> > limited to users using Mac OS. And then, I using the ping the ipv6
>>>>> >> address
>>>>> >> > on Mac OS, got the 'Unknown host', obviously macos uses ipv6 as
>>>>> the host
>>>>> >> > name. based on this default behavior of the operating system, I
>>>>> >> recommend
>>>>> >> > using macos with ipv4 and others with ipv4/ipv6.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > On 2024/01/18 06:54:14 Istvan Toth wrote:
>>>>> >> > > I think we should look into this a bit deeper.
>>>>> >> > > Why does this fail with IPv6 ?
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > Are we explicitly binding TSO to the IPv4 address only ?
>>>>> >> > > Do we only do that in the tests, or does that happen in
>>>>> production ?
>>>>> >> > > Is it even possible to use Omid with IPv6 ?
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > I suspect that fixing
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-249
>>>>> >> > would
>>>>> >> > > improve on this.
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > Generally, I think that having a single IP per TSO can be a
>>>>> problem
>>>>> >> in a
>>>>> >> > > mixed IPv4 / IPv6 network, and with some network configurations.
>>>>> >> > > Maybe we should store the name of the active server instead of
>>>>> >> addresses
>>>>> >> > in
>>>>> >> > > ZK, and kick this problem down to the network/DNS administrator.
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > If Omid is known to not work with IPV6 in 1.1.0 , then I'm OK
>>>>> with
>>>>> >> Cong's
>>>>> >> > > proposed solution, but if it breaks pre-existing Ipv6 support,
>>>>> then we
>>>>> >> > > should
>>>>> >> > > fix this properly for 1.1.1.
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > We should create a follow-up ticket to make sure the Omid is
>>>>> IPv6
>>>>> >> clean
>>>>> >> > for
>>>>> >> > > the next release at the very least.
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > Istvan
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 6:56 AM Cong Luo <l...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > > Hi Richard,
>>>>> >> > > >   Actually, I had the same issue before, but it was resolved
>>>>> >> locally:
>>>>> >> > if
>>>>> >> > > > the NIC was assigned both ipv4 and ipv6 addresses, use ipv4
>>>>> first.
>>>>> >> If
>>>>> >> > we
>>>>> >> > > > all think this is acceptable, then I will create a PR
>>>>> submission.
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > > On 2024/01/17 14:30:50 Richárd Antal wrote:
>>>>> >> > > > > -1
>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > Signature: OK
>>>>> >> > > > > Checksum: OK
>>>>> >> > > > > mvn clean apache-rat:check: OK
>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > Changes and release notes: OK
>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > Built from source (1.8.0_241): OK
>>>>> >> > > > >   - mvn clean install  -DskipTests
>>>>> >> > > > > Ran tests on my MacBook locally:
>>>>> >> > > > >   - mvn clean verify : Failed
>>>>> >> > > > > TestTSOClientConnectionToTSO had failing tests:
>>>>> >> > > > > testSuccessfulConnectionToTSOThroughZK and
>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>> testSuccessOfTSOClientReconnectionsToARestartedTSOWithZKPublishing
>>>>> >> > > > > It might be because it uses IPv6
>>>>> >> > > > > Some logs
>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > 2024-01-17T15:17:45,858 INFO
>>>>> >> > > > > >  [TestNGInvoker-testSuccessfulConnectionToTSOThroughZK()]
>>>>> >> > > > client.TSOClient:
>>>>> >> > > > > > * Current TSO host:port found in ZK:
>>>>> >> > > > > > [fe80:0:0:0:aede:48ff:fe00:1122%en5]:52934 Epoch 0
>>>>> >> > > > > > 2024-01-17T15:17:45,859 INFO  [tsofsm-0] client.TSOClient:
>>>>> >> Trying
>>>>> >> > to
>>>>> >> > > > > > connect to TSO [/fe80:0:0:0:aede:48ff:fe00:1122%en5:52934]
>>>>> >> > > > > > 2024-01-17T15:17:45,863 ERROR [tsoclient-worker-0]
>>>>> >> > client.TSOClient:
>>>>> >> > > > > > Failed connection attempt to TSO
>>>>> >> > > > > > [/fe80:0:0:0:aede:48ff:fe00:1122%en5:52934] failed.
>>>>> Channel [id:
>>>>> >> > > > 0x9d8c0b44]
>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > I’ve also tested the TestTSOClientConnectionToTSO on the
>>>>> 1.1.0
>>>>> >> > release
>>>>> >> > > > > locally and that was successful (It used IPv4).
>>>>> >> > > > > I think this is a regression on Mac and it would be nice to
>>>>> fix
>>>>> >> > before
>>>>> >> > > > the
>>>>> >> > > > > release.
>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > Richard
>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > Cong Luo <l...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2024. jan.
>>>>> 11., Cs,
>>>>> >> > 3:52):
>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > +1
>>>>> >> > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > I did a basic test last month in the test environment
>>>>> (fully
>>>>> >> > > > distributed)
>>>>> >> > > > > > based on phoenix 5.1.3 + omid 1.1.1 and did not find a
>>>>> blocking
>>>>> >> > issue.
>>>>> >> > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > On 2024/01/09 12:53:28 "rajeshb...@apache.org" wrote:
>>>>> >> > > > > > > Please vote on this Apache phoenix omid release
>>>>> candidate,
>>>>> >> > > > > > > phoenix-omid-1.1.1RC0
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > > The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache phoenix omid 1.1.1
>>>>> >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > > The tag to be voted on is 1.1.1RC0:
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > >   https://github.com/apache/phoenix-omid/tree/1.1.1RC0
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, as
>>>>> well as
>>>>> >> > > > CHANGES.md
>>>>> >> > > > > > > and RELEASENOTES.md included in this RC can be found at:
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/phoenix-omid-1.1.1RC0/
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > > Maven artifacts are available in a staging repository
>>>>> at:
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachephoenix-1251/
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > > Artifacts were signed with the 0x2CC0FD99 key which can
>>>>> be
>>>>> >> found
>>>>> >> > in:
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/phoenix/KEYS
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > > To learn more about Apache phoenix omid, please see
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > >   https://phoenix.apache.org/
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > > > Thanks,
>>>>> >> > > > > > > Rajeshbabu.
>>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > > >
>>>>> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > --
>>>>> >> > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
>>>>> >> > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com
>>>>> >> > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
>>>>> >> > > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
>>>>> >> > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera>
>>>>> [image:
>>>>> >> > > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera>
>>>>> [image:
>>>>> >> > Cloudera
>>>>> >> > > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
>>>>> >> > > ------------------------------
>>>>> >> > > ------------------------------
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
>>>>> >> *Email*: st...@cloudera.com
>>>>> >> cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
>>>>> >> [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
>>>>> >> [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
>>>>> >> Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image:
>>>>> >> Cloudera
>>>>> >> on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
>>>>> >> ------------------------------
>>>>> >> ------------------------------
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
>>>> *Email*: st...@cloudera.com
>>>> cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
>>>> [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
>>>> [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
>>>> Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image:
>>>> Cloudera on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
>>> *Email*: st...@cloudera.com
>>> cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
>>> [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
>>> [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
>>> Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image:
>>> Cloudera on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
>> *Email*: st...@cloudera.com
>> cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
>> [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
>> [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
>> Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image:
>> Cloudera on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
>> ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------
>>
>
>
> --
> *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
> *Email*: st...@cloudera.com
> cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
> [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
> [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
> Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image:
> Cloudera on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
> ------------------------------
> ------------------------------
>


-- 
*István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
*Email*: st...@cloudera.com
cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
[image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
[image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: Cloudera
on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
------------------------------
------------------------------

Reply via email to