-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/134/#review55
-----------------------------------------------------------



http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/builtin/BinStorageWithCaster.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/134/#comment37>

    I think BinStorageWithCaster should implement LoadCaster interface.


- thejas


On 2010-12-01 13:43:29, Daniel Dai wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/134/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-12-01 13:43:29)
> 
> 
> Review request for pig.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Change behavior of converting bytes loading from BinStorage.
> 1. Converting bytes loading from BinStorage() will now result an error.
> 2. If user clearly understand that the data is load from PigStorage (or other 
> LoadFunc using Utf8StorageConverter), he/she should use BinStorageWithCaster. 
> By doing this, converting bytes to other type will still work.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug PIG-1745.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1745
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/builtin/BinStorage.java
>  1040653 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/builtin/BinStorageWithCaster.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestEvalPipeline2.java
>  1040653 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/134/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> test-patch:
>      [exec] +1 overall.
>      [exec]
>      [exec]     +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
>      [exec]
>      [exec]     +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or 
> modified tests.
>      [exec]
>      [exec]     +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning 
> messages.
>      [exec]
>      [exec]     +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total 
> number of javac compiler warnings.
>      [exec]
>      [exec]     +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs 
> warnings.
>      [exec]
>      [exec]     +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the 
> total number of release audit warnings.
> 
> unit-test:
>     all pass
> 
> end-to-end test:
>     all pass
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Daniel
> 
>

Reply via email to