Daniel, I am getting an error when trying to view the diff:

The patch to '
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/logical/expression/BinCondExpression.java'
didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in
'/tmp/reviewboard.IBoaWc' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching
file /tmp/reviewboard.IBoaWc/tmpWoRpsq Hunk #1 FAILED at 98. 1 out of 1 hunk
FAILED -- saving rejects to file /tmp/reviewboard.IBoaWc/tmpWoRpsq-new.rej


D

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Daniel Dai <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/544/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Review request for pig and thejas.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> The following script produce wrong result:
>
> data = LOAD 'data.txt' using PigStorage() as (referrer:chararray,
> canonical_url:chararray, ip:chararray);
> best_url = FOREACH data GENERATE ((canonical_url != '' and canonical_url is
> not null) ? canonical_url : referrer) AS url, ip;
> filtered = FILTER best_url BY url == 'badsite.com';
> dump filtered;
>
> data.txt:
> badsite.com 127.0.0.1
> goodsite.com/1?foo=true goodsite.com 127.0.0.1
>
> Expected:
> (badsite.com,127.0.0.1)
>
> We get nothing.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/logical/expression/BinCondExpression.java1085215
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestNewPlanFilterAboveForeach.java1085215
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/544/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> test-patch:
>     [exec] +1 overall.
>     [exec]
>     [exec]     +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
>     [exec]
>     [exec]     +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or
> modified tests.
>     [exec]
>     [exec]     +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning
> messages.
>     [exec]
>     [exec]     +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total
> number of javac compiler warnings.
>     [exec]
>     [exec]     +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs
> warnings.
>     [exec]
>     [exec]     +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the
> total number of release audit warnings.
>
> Unit test:
>    all pass
>
> End-to-end test:
>    all pass
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel
>
>

Reply via email to