-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/544/#review382
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


+1

- thejas


On 2011-04-04 18:10:55, Daniel Dai wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/544/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-04-04 18:10:55)
> 
> 
> Review request for pig and thejas.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> The following script produce wrong result:
> 
> data = LOAD 'data.txt' using PigStorage() as (referrer:chararray, 
> canonical_url:chararray, ip:chararray);
> best_url = FOREACH data GENERATE ((canonical_url != '' and canonical_url is 
> not null) ? canonical_url : referrer) AS url, ip;
> filtered = FILTER best_url BY url == 'badsite.com';
> dump filtered;
> 
> data.txt:
> badsite.com 127.0.0.1
> goodsite.com/1?foo=true goodsite.com 127.0.0.1
> 
> Expected:
> (badsite.com,127.0.0.1)
> 
> We get nothing.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug PIG-1935.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1935
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/newplan/logical/expression/BinCondExpression.java
>  1085215 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestNewPlanFilterAboveForeach.java
>  1085215 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/544/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> test-patch:
>      [exec] +1 overall.  
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or 
> modified tests.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning 
> messages.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total 
> number of javac compiler warnings.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs 
> warnings.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the 
> total number of release audit warnings.
> 
> Unit test:
>     all pass
> 
> End-to-end test:
>     all pass
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Daniel
> 
>

Reply via email to