I agree, Alan, though I think we should make the deadline Monday, 4/2. Most testing is going to happen during the week anyway, and I'd like to give true believers the weekend to fix up anything that is lacking.
Sound ok? 2012/3/27 Alan Gates <[email protected]> > I propose we set a deadline and say patches need to be ready by that day, > or they don't go in. Otherwise this time next week there will be another > set of patches people would like to see. I'd say the deadline should be > 3/30 (this Friday). That would mean we could address any final test > failures we see and start rolling the RC next week. > > Alan. > > On Mar 27, 2012, at 12:00 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: > > > Bill, > > > > Thanks for going through those tickets. I marked them all as 0.10/0.11... > > 2616 seems like the only critical one, and the others are nice to haves > (I > > imagine 2587and 2574 won't be super critical until we build out the > systems > > that rely on them). All of them look pretty close so I'd have no problem > > with that. > > > > Hopefully tomorrow others can weigh in on their priorities. Then we can > > label things, work to finish them, and roll the RC. > > > > 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> > > > >> Yes, but CI anyway only run unit tests, we will have to run e2e test > >> by ourselves. > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Jonathan Coveney <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> Perhaps a big initiative for 0.11 could be to get the builds to the > point > >>> where flaky tests don't essentially gut the usefulness of the CI server > >>> (Pig 0.9 hasn't passed in 6 months, etc). I'm not sure how difficult > that > >>> would be though, and what the benefit would be. But it's pretty > annoying > >> to > >>> be able to wrap up a release when there are a bunch of "known useless" > >>> tests. > >>> > >>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> > >>> > >>>> Once PIG-2317 check in, only document patch (PIG-2601) and some of > >>>> Russell's patches left. Before roll up RC, we need to make sure all > >>>> unit tests and e2e tests pass, I can help with this. > >>>> > >>>> Daniel > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Coveney < > [email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> It's time to get serious about rolling an RC. 0.10 seems pretty > >> strong... > >>>>> are there any pressing JIRAs that people want to try and get in? > >> Looking > >>>> at > >>>>> the open JIRAs with a fix labeled of 0.10 (which is admittedly > >> possibly > >>>>> incomplete), it looks like there isn't anything terribly seriously > >>>> left... > >>>>> I'd love to get the ball rolling on an RC so we can test it and > >> identify > >>>>> any bugs. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thoughts? > >>>> > >> > >
