Sure, that's fine. Alan.
On Mar 27, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: > I agree, Alan, though I think we should make the deadline Monday, 4/2. Most > testing is going to happen during the week anyway, and I'd like to give > true believers the weekend to fix up anything that is lacking. > > Sound ok? > > 2012/3/27 Alan Gates <[email protected]> > >> I propose we set a deadline and say patches need to be ready by that day, >> or they don't go in. Otherwise this time next week there will be another >> set of patches people would like to see. I'd say the deadline should be >> 3/30 (this Friday). That would mean we could address any final test >> failures we see and start rolling the RC next week. >> >> Alan. >> >> On Mar 27, 2012, at 12:00 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: >> >>> Bill, >>> >>> Thanks for going through those tickets. I marked them all as 0.10/0.11... >>> 2616 seems like the only critical one, and the others are nice to haves >> (I >>> imagine 2587and 2574 won't be super critical until we build out the >> systems >>> that rely on them). All of them look pretty close so I'd have no problem >>> with that. >>> >>> Hopefully tomorrow others can weigh in on their priorities. Then we can >>> label things, work to finish them, and roll the RC. >>> >>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Yes, but CI anyway only run unit tests, we will have to run e2e test >>>> by ourselves. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Jonathan Coveney <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Perhaps a big initiative for 0.11 could be to get the builds to the >> point >>>>> where flaky tests don't essentially gut the usefulness of the CI server >>>>> (Pig 0.9 hasn't passed in 6 months, etc). I'm not sure how difficult >> that >>>>> would be though, and what the benefit would be. But it's pretty >> annoying >>>> to >>>>> be able to wrap up a release when there are a bunch of "known useless" >>>>> tests. >>>>> >>>>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>> Once PIG-2317 check in, only document patch (PIG-2601) and some of >>>>>> Russell's patches left. Before roll up RC, we need to make sure all >>>>>> unit tests and e2e tests pass, I can help with this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Daniel >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Coveney < >> [email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> It's time to get serious about rolling an RC. 0.10 seems pretty >>>> strong... >>>>>>> are there any pressing JIRAs that people want to try and get in? >>>> Looking >>>>>> at >>>>>>> the open JIRAs with a fix labeled of 0.10 (which is admittedly >>>> possibly >>>>>>> incomplete), it looks like there isn't anything terribly seriously >>>>>> left... >>>>>>> I'd love to get the ball rolling on an RC so we can test it and >>>> identify >>>>>>> any bugs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>> >>>> >> >>
