Ok, .10.1 is fine. On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We can put it into 0.10.1. > > IMO the only thing that should block a release, especially one that's > been pending for so long, are major regressions (efficiency or > functionality) or correctness issues. Things that didn't work before > still not working is unfortunate but not a blocker. > > (Also: this is why we should disconnect piggybank from pig releases...) > > D > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Russell Jurney > <russell.jur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This bug was never fixed, and I'm assured AvroStrorage fails on large > files > > in a production context. Any chance I can write tests for the patch in > > comments and get it in 0.10? > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2266 > > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Heh. Ok my +1 stands. > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> > wrote: > >> > Oddly enough that's how we've always done the version numbering in the > >> build file, setting it up for the next version. I agree we should > change > >> it, but since we've done it in every release since 0.1, I don't think we > >> should block 0.10 for it. The change is to change the directions in > >> HowToRelease. > >> > > >> > Alan. > >> > > >> > On Apr 24, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote: > >> > > >> >> That's a good catch. > >> >> > >> >> We shouldn't officially publish a "SNAPSHOT" build... > >> >> > >> >> Or does that get fixed only when you officially publish? Wouldn't the > >> >> signature change? > >> >> > >> >> D > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Bill Graham <billgra...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> >>> I'm working on getting through the unit tests, but should SNAPSHOT > >> still be > >> >>> in the version? > >> >>> > >> >>> $ grep SNAPSHOT build.xml > >> >>> <property name="version" value="${pig.version}-SNAPSHOT" /> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Joseph Adler < > joseph.ad...@gmail.com > >> >wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> Can you guys please fix > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2266 > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Without that, I can guarantee that AvroStorage will fail on large > >> files. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Joseph Adler <joseph.ad...@me.com > > > >> wrote: > >> >>>>> I will do it tomorrow on one of my workflows. Could take some > trial > >> and > >> >>>> error to get it working. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> -- Joe > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> On Apr 23, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Russell Jurney < > >> russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> Can someone from LinkedIn try this release candidate? It may > break > >> >>>>>> your AvroStorage, so that would be good to know. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> On Apr 23, 2012, at 6:36 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> +1 > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Verified several jobs using Elephant-Bird loaders. > >> >>>>>>> Tested correctness with pig.exec.mapPartAgg both true and false. > >> >>>>>>> Verified license. > >> >>>>>>> Verified release notes. > >> >>>>>>> Ran test-commit > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> D > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Daniel Dai < > >> da...@hortonworks.com> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> We should do sanity check of the package, such as unit tests, > e2e > >> >>>>>>>> tests, piggybank tests, package integrity, package signature, > >> license, > >> >>>>>>>> etc. However, if we find a new bug, usually we will push it to > the > >> >>>>>>>> next release at this stage unless it is a critical one. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>>>>> Daniel > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Prashant Kommireddi > >> >>>>>>>> <prash1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>> Hi Daniel, > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> What is required other than running the regular tests for > testing > >> >>>> release > >> >>>>>>>>> candidate? I can think of running a few existing scripts > against > >> >>>> candidate > >> >>>>>>>>> build and making sure outputs look fine. > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>>>>>> Prashant > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Daniel Dai < > >> da...@hortonworks.com> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.0. > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Keys used to sign the release are available at > >> >>>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup. > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Please download, test, and try it out: > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.0-candidate-0/ > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Tuesday, Apr > 24th. > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Daniel > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email > >> me at > >> >>> billgra...@gmail.com going forward.* > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com > datasyndrome.com > -- Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com datasyndrome.com
