+1. It would be great if we can have more frequent releases. Let me know if I can help in anyway, would be glad to be involved in the process.
Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2013, at 6:23 PM, Cheolsoo Park <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't mind driving it if everyone agrees with the time frame. > > One thing that I want to clarify is that the new AvroStorage is not > backward compatible[1]. In addition, there are a couple of features that > the new AvroStorage is missing at the moment[2]. > > So I was thinking that we keep the old AvroStorage in 0.12 and remove it at > a later release. In the meantime, we can port all the missing features and > encourage users to migrate to the new AvroStorage. Since the old and new > AvroStorages don't have the same namespace (i.e. the new one is built-in, > whereas the old one is in piggybank), I don't think that there will be > confusion. But please let me know if you disagree with me. > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3015?focusedCommentId=13493550&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13493550 > [2.1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2875 > [2.2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2579 > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Russell Jurney > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Anyone up for doing a release 3-4 months after Pig 0.11, the way I think it >> is 'supposed' to work? I want the new AvroStorage in my book, before it >> comes out in print :) >> >> -- >> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney [email protected] >> datasyndrome.com >>
