This makes sense to me, and thank you for driving it. I am going to help doing docs and other things in little JIRAs.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Cheolsoo Park <[email protected]>wrote: > I don't mind driving it if everyone agrees with the time frame. > > One thing that I want to clarify is that the new AvroStorage is not > backward compatible[1]. In addition, there are a couple of features that > the new AvroStorage is missing at the moment[2]. > > So I was thinking that we keep the old AvroStorage in 0.12 and remove it at > a later release. In the meantime, we can port all the missing features and > encourage users to migrate to the new AvroStorage. Since the old and new > AvroStorages don't have the same namespace (i.e. the new one is built-in, > whereas the old one is in piggybank), I don't think that there will be > confusion. But please let me know if you disagree with me. > > [1] > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3015?focusedCommentId=13493550&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13493550 > [2.1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2875 > [2.2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2579 > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Russell Jurney <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Anyone up for doing a release 3-4 months after Pig 0.11, the way I think > it > > is 'supposed' to work? I want the new AvroStorage in my book, before it > > comes out in print :) > > > > -- > > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney [email protected] > > datasyndrome.com > > > -- Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney [email protected] datasyndrome.com
