+1 on releasing a 0.13 and if somebody feels strongly about releasing a
0.12.1 that fixes PIG-3492 I am +1 on that too.

--
Gianmarco


On 13 February 2014 03:08, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com> wrote:

> So I think we agree that we should branch 0.13 at this point, right?
>
> (and possibly look at releasing an incremental bump to 12 or 10? I'm not
> sure what should be included there but I support the general idea).
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Koji Noguchi <knogu...@yahoo-inc.com>
> wrote:
>
> > > Releasing 0.13 and 0.10.1 is totally independent in my opinion
> > >
> > I should have referenced my previous request on including 0.10.1 on the
> > top release page.
> >    http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@pig.apache.org/msg20629.html
> >
> > > By minor I meant 0.13
> > > 0.10.1 is a bug fix release.
> > > as in Major.Minor.BugFix
> > >
> > I see. Then I should have said,
> >   "but I'd like to request we make BugFix releases more often."
> >
> > Thanks for correcting my mistake.
> >
> > Koji
> >
> >
> > On Feb 6, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Julien Le Dem <jul...@ledem.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Releasing 0.13 and 0.10.1 is totally independent in my opinion.
> > > It just takes the time of a committer that needs the release to happen
> > to do it.
> > >
> > > By minor I meant 0.13
> > > 0.10.1 is a bug fix release.
> > > as in Major.Minor.BugFix
> > >
> > > Our Major version is still 0
> > >
> > > On Feb 6, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Koji Noguchi wrote:
> > >
> > >>> To add to the discussion, I think we should release more often, based
> > on time elapsed rather than volume of change.
> > >>>
> > >> I don't have preference on the frequency, but I'd like to request we
> > make minor releases more often.
> > >>
> > >> At this moment, stable pig release (to me) is still 0.10.1.
> > >> 0.11.1 and 0.12.0 both have regression bug PIG-3492 that caused
> > multiple production pig scripts in our clusters to fail randomly.
> > >> (unless user is disabling ColumnMapKeyPrune)
> > >>
> > >> If releasing 0.13 means 0.10.1 gets kicked out from the front release
> > list, I'd like to see minor release on 0.11 or 0.12 first.
> > >>
> > >> Koji
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Feb 6, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Cheolsoo Park <piaozhe...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 to 0.13 release. Why not if someone is volunteering?
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Julien Le Dem <jul...@ledem.net>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> To add to the discussion, I think we should release more often,
> based
> > on
> > >>>> time elapsed rather than volume of change.
> > >>>> The more often we release, the easier it is to release.
> > >>>> Also that makes it easier for contributors to use their own
> > contributions
> > >>>> in official releases.
> > >>>> It is also probably a good idea to have a clean starting point
> before
> > >>>> merging the Tez branch
> > >>>>
> > >>>> That said, I think those changes by themselves are enough to
> warrant a
> > >>>> minor release.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Julien
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Feb 6, 2014, at 12:24 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Major updates since we release 12 that are currently in trunk:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - lazy output (don't generate empty part files)
> > >>>>> - jar caching optimization
> > >>>>> - automatic local mode for small job (big wall-clock wins for
> > long-tail
> > >>>>> jobs)
> > >>>>> - improved support for BigInteger, BigDecimal
> > >>>>> - hbase loader improvements
> > >>>>> - debug mode that leaves temp files around for examination (!)
> > >>>>> - fixes to a few nasty bugs (PIG-3641)
> > >>>>> - pluggable execution engine allowing work like Tez and Spork
> > >>>>> - .. and more
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I'd say this justifies a release.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> D
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Aniket Mokashi <
> aniket...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> List I mentioned is pending tasks before we can make a release.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> A complete list of contributions can be seen at -
> > >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/CHANGES.txt?view=markup.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Some of the things that make it a good candidate for a release-
> > >>>>>> - PIG-3419 (has several backwards incompatible api changes)
> > >>>>>> - PIG-2672
> > >>>>>> - PIG-3642
> > >>>>>> - PIG-3463
> > >>>>>> - PIG-3511
> > >>>>>> - PIG-3657
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>> Aniket
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Olga Natkovich <
> > onatkov...@yahoo.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Just going by the list that Aniket provided, I don't really see
> > enough
> > >>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>> a full release. Two mentioned JIRAs are doc updates and one is a
> > bug
> > >>>> fix
> > >>>>>>> that was ported into Pig 12.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 3:13 PM, Aniket Mokashi <
> > >>>>>>> aniket...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi All,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> A good number of improvements and bug fixes have gone into trunk
> > >>>>>> recently.
> > >>>>>>> I'd like to know if we can roll out a Pig 0.13 release around
> > >>>> mid-March?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I am aware that we are planning to merge tez branch into trunk
> > soon.
> > >>>>>>> However, making a release before tez branch is merged will be
> > good. Any
> > >>>>>>> objections?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Following are few jiras we need to wrap up before 0.13 release-
> > >>>>>>> PIG-3591
> > >>>>>>> PIG-3740
> > >>>>>>> PIG-3745
> > >>>>>>> PIG-3347
> > >>>>>>> PIG-3731
> > >>>>>>> Any other?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>> Aniket
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> "...:::Aniket:::... Quetzalco@tl"
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to