I would be in favor of "More Frequent Releases" - minor and bug fixes
provided we have enough to warrant one. With 0.13, there are enough new
features/bug fixes/improvements to make a release soon IMO. And it might
possibly take some effort to stabilize 0.13 (even without PIG-3591).

Cheolsoo - how about branching 0.13 without PIG-3591, including it for 0.14
and taking time to test/stabilize the next version?


On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Cheolsoo Park <piaozhe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Or we perhaps wait until we stabilize trunk first. Given that PIG-3591 is
> necessary to implement a non-MR execution engine, it would make sense to
> include it in addition to PIG-3419 in 0.13. Furthermore, I'm refactoring
> ScriptState class while implementing PPNL for Tez. If we want to avoid API
> changes after 0.13, we might spend more time before the release.
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Daniel Dai <da...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> > If we are going to release 0.13.0 in 1-2 months time frame, we shall
> > definitely branch before check in PIG-3591. PIG-3591 could introduce
> > regressions and we need time to stabilize it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Daniel
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy
> > <rohini.adi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Aniket wanted to make a 0.13 release. Recently we checked in
> > > PIG-3591: Refactor POPackage to separate MR specific code from
> packaging
> > (
> > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1585283) which is
> a
> > lot
> > > of change. I think we should create the branch-0.13 before this
> revision
> > > and start putting only important or critical patches in 0.13 there
> after.
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Rohini
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>

Reply via email to